Prediction of Amelia Rajecki vs Laura Deigman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
A. Rajecki vs L. Deigman

Amelia Rajecki

GBR

0

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

446

C. Rank

Ret.

392

Best Rank

629

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$5.0K

Career Money

Plays

Laura Deigman

GBR

0

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

446

C. Rank

Ret.

392

Best Rank

629

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$5.0K

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Rajecki 0 - 0 Deigman

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Rajecki	0
Deigman	0

Last 0 H2H Matches:

No past h2h happened.

A. Rajecki vs L. Deigman H2H Profile

A. Rajecki	Stats	L. Deigman
$4,965	Career Prize Money	$0
52.63% (70-63)	Career Total W/L	37.97% (90-147)
1	Titles	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

A. Rajecki vs L. Deigman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Amelia Rajecki has won 39.18% of points on their second serve, while Laura Deigman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Amelia Rajecki, in recent form, has won 51.12% of their opponent's second serve points, while Laura Deigman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.93% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Amelia Rajecki has saved 49.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Laura Deigman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Amelia Rajecki has won 50.00% of matches played (W/L 28/28), with Laura Deigman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Amelia Rajecki has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 39/32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 7/12). Laura Deigman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 71/102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/8).
Player level: In the last year, Amelia Rajecki has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 25/25), where as Laura Deigman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Amelia Rajecki has played against opponents with an average rank of 381.64 while Laura Deigman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Amelia Rajecki has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Laura Deigman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Amelia Rajecki has converted 29.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Laura Deigman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Amelia Rajecki vs Laura Deigman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

Recent Performance Stats

A. Rajecki Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W75 Toronto - 27-10-2025
R2 Harriet DartH. Dart	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
R1 Mayu CrossleyM. Crossley	W	6-2 7-5	Stats
W75 Saguenay - 20-10-2025
R2 Yuno KitaharaY. Kitahara	L	2-6 6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Haruna ArakawaH. Arakawa	W	6-1 6-4	Stats
Abierto Tampico - Tampico - 13-10-2025
R1 Lea MaL. Ma	L	7-6(5) 6-1	Stats

View All

L. Deigman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
All Lower level tournaments - 01-06-2020
R1 Nadia RawsonN. Rawson	L	0-6 6-2 10-4	Stats
R1 Abigail AmosA. Amos	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
R1 Amelia RajeckiA. Rajecki	L	2-6 6-1 10-7	Stats
R1 Nadia RawsonN. Rawson	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
R1 Eliz MaloneyE. Maloney	L	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

A. Rajecki vs L. Deigman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

A. Rajecki	Stats	L. Deigman
52.63% (70/63)	YTD Win/Loss	37.97% (90/147)
53.16% (160/141)	Sets Win/Loss	39.20% (205/318)
51.82% (1437/1336)	Games Win/Loss	46.38% (2109/2438)
54.93% (39/32)	Hard Win/Loss	41.04% (71/102)
0% (0/0)	Clay Win/Loss	25.00% (3/9)
55.81% (24/19)	Indoor Hard W/L	36.36% (16/28)
36.84% (7/12)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/8)
0.45	Aces Per Game	0.04
601	Aces Total	99
0.5	Double Faults Per Game	0.11
675	Total Double Faults	245
1:28:53	Average Match Time	1st Match
409.8	Average Opponent Rank	519.87
57% (4914/8590)	1st Serve %	62% (2071/3318)
70% (3425/4914)	1st Serve Win %	59% (1229/2071)
44% (1613/3676)	2nd Serve Win %	39% (491/1247)
46% (389/841)	Break Points Won % (Total)	46% (150/329)
42% (3386/8128)	Return Points Win %	41% (1290/3131)
0.00% (0/2)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
42.86% (3/4)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/2)
50.47% (54/53)	Challenger W/L	25.71% (9/26)
76.47% (13/4)	Futures W/L	40.50% (81/119)
52% (68/131)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	37% (87/234)
59% (17/29)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	25% (6/24)
41% (15/37)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (24/53)
88% (68/60)	1st Set Won, Won Match	78% (99/77)
12% (68/8)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	22% (99/22)
15% (65/10)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	8% (138/11)